🖉 Algebraic Topology Functors
This will be old news to anyone who does algebraic topology, but oddly enough I can’t seem to find it all written in one place anywhere, and in particular I can’t find the bit about at all.
In algebraic topology you (for example) associate every topological space with a group, like or . All of these operations turn out to be functors. This isn’t surprising, because as far as I’m concerned the definition of a functor is “any time you take one type of object and naturally make another object”.
The surprise is that these objects also respect homotopy in a nice way; proving this is a fair amount of the “setup” work in algebraic topology.
1. Homology,
Note that is a functor i.e. to every space we can associate a group . (Of course, replace by integer of your choice.) Recall that:
Definition 1. Two maps are homotopy equivalent if there exists a homotopy between them.
Thus for a map we can take its homotopy class (the equivalence class under this relationship). This has the nice property that and so on.
Definition 2. Two spaces and are homotopic if there exists a pair of maps and such that and .
In light of this, we can define
Definition 3. The category is defined as follows:
- The objects are topological spaces .
- The morphisms are homotopy classes of continuous maps .
Remark 4. Composition is well-defined since . Two spaces are isomorphic in if they are homotopic.
Remark 5. As you might guess this “quotient” construction is called a quotient category.
Then the big result is that:
Theorem 6. The induced map of a map depends only on the homotopy class of . Thus is a functor
The proof of this is geometric, using the so-called prism operators. In any case, as with all functors we deduce
Corollary 7. if and are homotopic.
In particular, the contractable spaces are those spaces which are homotopy equivalent to a point. In which case, for all .
2. Relative Homology,
In fact, we also defined homology groups for . We will now show this is functorial too.
Definition 8. Let and be subspaces, and consider a map . If we write We say is a map of pairs, between the pairs and .
Definition 9. We say that are pair-homotopic if they are “homotopic through maps of pairs”.
More formally, a pair-homotopy is a map , which we’ll write as , such that is a homotopy of the maps and each is itself a map of pairs.
Thus, we naturally arrive at two categories:
- , the category of pairs of topological spaces, and
- , the same category except with maps only equivalent up to homotopy.
Definition 10. As before, we say pairs and are pair-homotopy equivalent if they are isomorphic in . An isomorphism of is a pair-homotopy equivalence.
Then, the prism operators now let us derive
Theorem 11. We have a functor The usual corollaries apply.
Now, we want an analog of contractable spaces for our pairs: i.e. pairs of spaces such that for . The correct definition is:
Definition 12. Let . We say that is a deformation retract of if there is a map of pairs which is a pair homotopy equivalence.
Example 13 (Examples of Deformation Retracts)
- If a single point is a deformation retract of a space , then is contractable, since the retraction (when viewed as a map ) is homotopic to the identity map .
- The punctured disk deformation retracts onto its boundary .
- More generally, deformation retracts onto its boundary .
- Similarly, deformation retracts onto a sphere .
Of course in this situation we have that
3. Homotopy,
As a special case of the above, we define
Definition 14. The category is defined as follows:
- The objects are pairs of spaces with a distinguished basepoint . We call these pointed spaces.
- The morphisms are maps , meaning is continuous and .
Now again we mod out:
Definition 15. Two maps of pointed spaces are homotopic if there is a homotopy between them which also fixes the basepoints. We can then, in the same way as before, define the quotient category .
And lo and behold:
Theorem 16. We have a functor Same corollaries as before.