(EDIT: These solutions earned me a slot in N1, top 16.)
I solved eight problems on the Putnam last Saturday.
Here were the solutions I found during the exam,
plus my repaired solution to B3 (the solution to B3 I submitted originally had a mistake).
Some comments about the test.
I thought that the A test had easy problems: problems A1, A3, A4 were all routine,
and problem A5 is a little long-winded but nothing magical.
Problem A2 was tricky, and took me well over half the A session.
I don’t know anything about A6, but it seems to be very hard.
The B session, on the other hand, was completely bizarre.
In my opinion, the difficulty of the problems I did attempt was
B4≪B1≪B5<B3<B2.
1. Problems
1.1. Day A
Points A and B are on the same branch of the hyperbola xy=1.
Point P is selected between them maximizing the area of △ABP.
Show that the area of region bounded by the hyperbola and AP equals the
area of region bounded by the hyperbola and BP.
Define a0=1, a1=2 and an=4an−1−an−2. Find an odd prime dividing a2015.
Compute
log2a=1∏2015b=1∏2015(1+e20152πiab).
Let f(x)=∑n∈Sx2−n where
Sx={n∈Z+∣⌊nx⌋ even}.
Compute infx∈[0,1)f(x).
Let q≥1 be an odd integer and define
Nq=#{0<a<q/4∣gcd(a,q)=1}.
Prove Nq is odd if and only if q=pk for some prime p≡5,7(mod8).
Let A, B, M, X be n×n real matrices.
Prove that if AM=MB and A,
B have the same characteristic polynomial then det(A−MX)=det(B−XM).
1.2. Night B
Let f:R→R be thrice differentiable.
Prove that if f has at least five distinct roots then
f+6f′+12f"+8f′′′ has at least two distinct roots.
Starting with the list of positive integers 1,2,3,…,
we repeatedly remove the first three elements as well as their sum, giving a sequence of sums 1+2+3=6,
4+5+7=16, 8+9+10=27, 11+12+13=36, 14+15+17=46, and so on.
Decide whether some sum in the sequence ends with 2015 in base 10.
Define S to be the set of real matrices
(acbd) such that a, b, c,
d form an arithmetic progression in that order.
Find all M∈S such that for some integer k>1, Mk∈S.
Let $ T = \left{a,b,c) \in \mathbb Z_+^3 \mid a,b,c \text{ are sides of a triangle} \right} $.
Prove that
(a,b,c)∈T∑3b5c2a
is rational and determine its value.
Let Pn be the number of permutations
π:{1,…,n}→{1,…,n} such that
∣π(i)−π(j)∣≤2 where ∣i−j∣≤1. For any n≥2 show that
Pn+5−Pn+4−Pn+3+Pn
does not depend on n and determine its value.
Let a(k) be the number of odd divisors of k in the interval [1,2k). Compute
k≥1∑k(−1)k−1a(k).
2. Solution to Problem A1
Standard A1 fare. WLOG A is to the left of B on the positive branch.
First we claim the tangent to P must be parallel to line AB;
otherwise let it intersect the parabola again at P′,
and any point between P and P′ will increase the area of △ABP. In that case, we must have
−p21=a−ba1−b1⟹p=ab
Now the area bounded by AP is
2a1+p1⋅(p−a)−∫apx1dx=21(ap−pa)−log(ap).
The area of BP is computed similarly and gives
21(pb−bp)−log(pb)
and so these are equal.
3. Solution to Problem A2
By induction we have an=21((2+3)n+(2−3)n).
Thus am∣a(2k+1)m for any k, m,
because their quotient is both rational and an algebraic integer. Thus a5=362=2⋅181.
During the test, I only found this solution by computing a1, …,
a11 explicitly and factoring the first 10 numbers, upon which I realized a3∣a9.
4. Solution to Problem A3
First, we use the fact that for any odd integer m, we have
1≤b≤m∏(1+ζb)=2
where ζ is an m-th root of unity. (Just plug −1 into Xm−1.) Thus
We first prove that f(x)≥74 for every x∈[0,1).
It suffices to consider x≥21 since otherwise f(x)≥21+41.
We note that for any k, if k∈/Sx and k+1∈/Sx then we require
that ⌊kx⌋=⌊(k+1)x⌋=2m+1 for some m;
since 1≤2x<2 this implies ⌊(k+2)x⌋=2m+2.
Thus among any three consecutive numbers, at least one is in Sx.
Plainly 1∈Sx and hence f(x)≥2−1+2−4+2−7+⋯=74.
Finally note that
f(32−ε)→74asx→32
so the answer is L=74.
6. Solution to Problem A5
Let q=p1e1p2e2…pnen.
By Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (or Moebius inversion?) we have
Nq=S⊂{1,…,n}∑(−1)∣S∣⌊4∏s∈Spsq⌋.
The (−1)∣S∣ vanishes when taking modulo 2.
Now, ⌊4∙⌋(mod2) depends only on the input modulo 8,
equalling 0 for 1,3(mod8) and 1 for 5,7(mod8).
As p2≡1(mod8) the exponents in the floor also can be taken mod 2.
Therefore, we can simplify this to
Nq≡S⊂{1,…,n}∑⌊8q∏s∈Sps⌋(mod2).
Let A(S)=⌊8q∏s∈Sps⌋(mod2).
The solution now proceeds in three cases.
If any prime is 1 or 3 mod 8, say p1,
then A(T)=A(T∪{1}) for T⊂{2,…,n} and thus Nq is even.
If all primes are 5 or 7 mod 8 and n≥2,
then A(T)=A(T∪{1,2}) and A(T∪{1})=A(T∪{2}) for
T⊂{3,…,n} and thus Nq is even.
But if n=1 and p1≡5,7(mod8) then A(∅)+A({1}) is always odd.
This completes the proof.
7. Solution to Problem B1
Let X(f)=f+2f′. The problem asks to show f having five distinct real
roots implies X(X(X(f))) has at least two. But by Rolle’s Theorem on
g(x)=e21xf(x)⟹2g′(x)=e21x(f(x)+2f′(x))
we see that f having k roots gives X(f) having k−1 roots, so done.
(I’m told the trick of considering this function g is not new,
though I came up with it during the exam so I can’t verify this.)
Lots of people said something about trying to use the Intermediate Value Theorem
to show that X(f) has a root between any two roots of f.
This would require f to be continuously differentiable,
so it breaks down at the last application to X(X(X(f))).
I deliberately appealed to Rolle’s Theorem because I didn’t trust myself to deal
with these real-analytic issues during the exam.
8. Solution to Problem B3
The answer is
(tttt)and(−3tt−t3t)
for t∈R. These work by taking k=3.
Now to see these are the only ones, consider an arithmetic matrix
M=(aa+2ea+ea+3e).
which is not zero everywhere.
Its characteristic polynomial is t2−(2a+3e)t−2e2, with discriminant (2a+3e)2+8e2,
so it has two distinct real roots; moreover,
since −2e2≤0 either one of the roots is zero or they are of opposite signs.
Now if Mk∈S too then the same calculation gives
qs−pr=λ1k−λ2kλ1k+λ2k.
Let x=λ1/λ2<0 (since −2e2<0). We appropriately get
x−1x+1=xk−1xk+1⟹x−12=xk−12⟹x=xk⟹x=−1 or x=0
and k odd. If x=0 we get e=0 and if x=−1 we get 2a+3e=0,
which gives the curve of solutions that we claimed.
(Unfortunately, during the test I neglected to address x=−1, which probably means I will get null marks.)
No idea why this was B4; it was by far the easiest problem on the test for me.
I knew how to do it in less than a second on seeing it and the rest was just arithmetic.
(We use the Ravi substitution all the time on olympiad inequalities, so it’s practically a reflex for me.)
10. Solution to Problem B5
My solution was long and disgusting, so I won’t write out the full details.
The idea is to let An be the number of permutations in Pn+1 with the
additional property that π(1)=1.
By casework on the index k with π(k)=1 (which must be surrounded by 2
or 3 if k=1,n) one obtains
Pn=2(A0+A1+⋯+An−3+An−1)n≥2.
Also by more casework one obtains the recursion
An=An−1+An−3+1n≥3.
From this one obtains
Pn−Pn−1=2(An−1−An−2+An−3)=2(An−3+An−4+1).
So we know Pn+5−Pn+4 and can compute
Pn+3−Pn=(Pn+3−Pn+2)+(Pn+2−Pn+1)+(Pn+1−Pn) so a
long algebraic computation gives that these differ by 4.
Also, I swear I’ve seen the exact condition ∣π(i)−π(j)∣≤2 many years ago,
back when I was doing high school olympiads. But it was so long ago I don’t remember the source.