In the previous post we defined p-adic numbers.
This post will state (mostly without proof) some more surprising results about
continuous functions f:Zp→Qp.
Then we give the famous proof of the Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem using p-adic analysis.
1. Digression on Cp
Before I go on, I want to mention that Qp is not algebraically closed.
So, we can take its algebraic closure Qp — but this
field is now no longer complete (in the topological sense).
However, we can then take the completion of this space to obtain Cp.
In general, completing an algebraically closed field remains algebraically closed,
and so there is a larger space
I think this post is more than two years late in coming, but anywhow…
This post introduces the p-adic integers Zp, and the p-adic numbers Qp.
The one-sentence description is that these are “integers/rationals carrying full
mod pe information” (and only that information).
The first four sections will cover the founding definitions culminating in a
short solution to a USA TST problem.
In this whole post, p is always a prime.
Much of this is based off of Chapter 3A from Straight from the Book.
1. Motivation
Before really telling you what Zp and Qp are,
let me tell you what you might expect them to do.
In elementary/olympiad number theory, we’re already well-familiar …
Here I talk about my first project at the Emory REU.
Prerequisites for this post: some familiarity with number fields.
1. Motivation: Arithmetic Progressions
Given a property P about primes, there’s two questions we can ask:
- How many primes ≤x are there with this property?
- What’s the least prime with this property?
As an example, consider an arithmetic progression a, a+d, …, with a<d and gcd(a,d)=1.
The strong form of Dirichlet’s Theorem tells us that basically,
the number of primes ≡a(modd) is d1 the total number of primes.
Moreover, the celebrated Linnik’s
Theorem tells us that the
first prime is
In this post I will sketch a proof Dirichlet Theorem’s in the following form:
Theorem 1 (Dirichlet’s Theorem on Arithmetic Progression)
Let
ψ(x;q,a)=n≤xn≡amodq∑Λ(n).
Let N be a positive constant.
Then for some constant C(N)>0 depending on N, we have for any q such that q≤(logx)N we have