vEnhance's avatar
#analytic number theory Page 1 of 1

Oct 25, 2018

🖉 A trailer for p-adic analysis, second half: Mahler coefficients

In the previous post we defined pp-adic numbers. This post will state (mostly without proof) some more surprising results about continuous functions f ⁣:ZpQpf \colon \mathbb Z_p \rightarrow \mathbb Q_p. Then we give the famous proof of the Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem using pp-adic analysis.

1. Digression on Cp\mathbb C_p

Before I go on, I want to mention that Qp\mathbb Q_p is not algebraically closed. So, we can take its algebraic closure Qp\overline{\mathbb Q_p} — but this field is now no longer complete (in the topological sense). However, we can then take the completion of this space to obtain Cp\mathbb C_p. In general, completing an algebraically closed field remains algebraically closed, and so there is a larger space Cp\mathbb …

Read more...

Oct 10, 2018

🖉 A trailer for p-adic analysis, first half: USA TST 2003

I think this post is more than two years late in coming, but anywhow…

This post introduces the pp-adic integers Zp\mathbb Z_p, and the pp-adic numbers Qp\mathbb Q_p. The one-sentence description is that these are “integers/rationals carrying full mod pep^e information” (and only that information).

The first four sections will cover the founding definitions culminating in a short solution to a USA TST problem.

In this whole post, pp is always a prime. Much of this is based off of Chapter 3A from Straight from the Book.

1. Motivation

Before really telling you what Zp\mathbb Z_p and Qp\mathbb Q_p are, let me tell you what you might expect them to do.

In elementary/olympiad number theory, we’re already well-familiar …

Read more...

Jul 05, 2015

🖉 Linnik's Theorem for Sato-Tate Laws on CM Elliptic Curves

Here I talk about my first project at the Emory REU. Prerequisites for this post: some familiarity with number fields.

1. Motivation: Arithmetic Progressions

Given a property PP about primes, there’s two questions we can ask:

  1. How many primes x\le x are there with this property?
  2. What’s the least prime with this property?

As an example, consider an arithmetic progression aa, a+da+d, …, with a<da < d and gcd(a,d)=1\gcd(a,d) = 1. The strong form of Dirichlet’s Theorem tells us that basically, the number of primes a(modd)\equiv a \pmod d is 1d\frac 1d the total number of primes. Moreover, the celebrated Linnik’s Theorem tells us that the first prime is O(d …

Read more...

Jun 12, 2015

🖉 Proof of Dirichlet's Theorem on Arithmetic Progressions

In this post I will sketch a proof Dirichlet Theorem’s in the following form:

Theorem 1 (Dirichlet’s Theorem on Arithmetic Progression)

Let ψ(x;q,a)=nxnamodqΛ(n).\psi(x;q,a) = \sum_{\substack{n \le x \\ n \equiv a \mod q}} \Lambda(n). Let NN be a positive constant. Then for some constant C(N)>0C(N) > 0 depending on NN, we have for any qq such that q(logx)Nq \le (\log x)^N we have ψ(x;q,a)=1ϕ(q)x+O(xexp(C(N)logx))\psi(x;q,a) = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} x + O\left( x\exp\left(-C(N) \sqrt{\log …

Read more...
#analytic number theory Page 1 of 1