vEnhance's avatar

Nov 30, 2014

🖉 Three Properties of Isogonal Conjugates

In this post I’ll cover three properties of isogonal conjugates which were only recently made known to me. These properties are generalization of some well-known lemmas, such as the incenter/excenter lemma and the nine-point circle.

1. Definitions

Let ABCABC be a triangle with incenter II, and let PP be any point in the interior of ABCABC. Then we obtain three lines APAP, BPBP, CPCP. Then the reflections of these lines across lines AIAI, BIBI, CICI always concur at a point QQ which is called the isogonal conjugate of PP. (The proof of this concurrence follows from readily from Trig Ceva.) When PP lies inside ABCABC, then QQ is the point for which BAP=CAQ\angle BAP = \angle CAQ and so on.

Definition of isogonal conjugate.
Definition of isogonal conjugate.

The isogonal conjugate of PP is sometimes denoted PP^\ast. Note that (P)=P(P^\ast)^\ast = P.

Examples of pairs of isogonal conjugates include the following.

  1. The incenter is its own isogonal conjugate. Similarly, each excenter is also its own isogonal conjugate.
  2. The isogonal conjugate of the circumcenter is the orthocenter.
  3. The isogonal conjugate of the centroid is the symmedian point.
  4. The isogonal conjugate of the Nagel point is the point of concurrence of ATAAT_A, BTBBT_B, CTCCT_C, where TAT_A is the contact point of the AA-mixtilinear incircle. The proof of this result was essentially given as Problem 5 of the European Girl’s Math Olympiad.

2. Inverses and circumcircles

You may already be aware of the famous result (which I always affectionately call “Fact 5”) that the circumcenter of BICBIC is the midpoint of arc BCBC of the circumcircle of ABCABC. Indeed, so is the circumcenter of triangle BIACBI_AC, where IAI_A is the AA-excenter.

The incenter-excenter lemma.
The incenter-excenter lemma.

In fact, it turns out that we can generalize this result for arbitrary isogonal conjugates as follows.

Theorem 1. Let PP and QQ be isogonal conjugates. Then the circumcenters of BPC\triangle BPC and BQC\triangle BQC are inverses with respect to the circumcircle of ABC\triangle ABC.

Theorem 1 illustration.
Theorem 1 illustration.

Proof: This is just angle chasing. Let OPO_P and OQO_Q be the desired circumcenters. It’s clear that both OPO_P and OQO_Q lie on the perpendicular bisector of BC\overline{BC}. Angle chasing allows us to compute that BOPO=12BOPC=180BPC.\angle BO_PO = \frac 12 \angle BO_PC = 180^{\circ} - \angle BPC. Similarly, BOQO=180BQC\angle BO_QO = 180^{\circ} - \angle BQC. But the reader can check that BPC+BQC=180+A\angle BPC + \angle BQC = 180^{\circ} + A. Using this we can show that OBOQ=BOPO\angle OBO_Q = \angle BO_PO, so OBOPOOQB\triangle OBO_P \sim \triangle OO_QB, as needed. \Box

When we take PP and QQ to be II (or IAI_A), we recover the Fact 5 we mentioned above. When we take PP to be the orthocenter and QQ to be the circumcenter, we find that the circumcenter of BHCBHC is the inverse of the circumcenter of BOCBOC. But the inverse of the circumcenter of BOCBOC is the reflection of OO over BC\overline{BC}. Thus we derive that BHC\triangle BHC and BOC\triangle BOC have circumcircles which are just reflections over BC\overline{BC}.

3. Pedal circles

You may already be aware of the nine-point circle, which passes through the midpoints and feet of the altitudes of ABCABC. In fact, we can obtain such a circle for any pair of isogonal conjugates.

Theorem 2. Let PP and QQ be isogonal conjugates in the interior of ABC\triangle ABC. The pedal triangles of PP and QQ share a circumcircle. Moreover, the center of this circle is the midpoint MM of PQ\overline{PQ}.

Theorem 2 illustration.
Theorem 2 illustration.

Upon taking P=HP=H and Q=OQ=O we recover the nine-point circle. Of course, the incircle is the special case P=Q=IP=Q=I!

Proof: Let PAPBPC\triangle P_AP_BP_C and QAQBQC\triangle Q_AQ_BQ_C be the pedal triangles. We leave the reader to check that APCAQC=APAQcosBAPcosBAQ=APBAQB.AP_C \cdot AQ_C = AP \cdot AQ \cdot \cos \angle BAP \cdot \cos \angle BAQ = AP_B \cdot AQ_B. Consequently, the points PCP_C, QCQ_C, PBP_B, QBQ_B are concyclic. The circumcenter of these four points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of segments PCQC\overline{P_CQ_C} and PBQB\overline{P_BQ_B}, which is precisely MM. Thus MPC=MQC=MPB=MQB.MP_C = MQ_C = MP_B = MQ_B. Similarly work with the other vertices shows that MM is indeed the desired circumcenter. \Box

There is a second way to phrase this theorem by taking a homothety at QQ.

Corollary. If the point QQ is reflected about the sides AB\overline{AB}, BC\overline{BC}, and CA\overline{CA}, then the resulting triangle has circumcenter PP.

4. Ellipses

We can actually derive the following remarkable result from the above theorem.

Theorem 3. An ellipse E\mathcal E is inscribed in triangle ABCABC. Then the foci PP and QQ are isogonal conjugates.

Of course, the incircle is just the special case when the ellipse is a circle.

Theorem 3 illustration.
Theorem 3 illustration.

Proof: We will deduce this from the corollary. Let the ellipse be tangent at points DD, EE, FF. Moreover, let the reflection of QQ about the sides of ABC\triangle ABC be points XX, YY, ZZ. By definition, there is a common sum ss with s=PD+DQ=PE+EQ+PF+FQ.s = PD + DQ = PE + EQ + PF + FQ. Because of the tangency condition, the points PP, DD, XX are collinear. But now PX=PD+DX=PD+DQ=sPX = PD+DX = PD+DQ = s and we deduce PX=PY=PZ=s.PX = PY = PZ = s. So PP is the circumcenter of XYZ\triangle XYZ. Hence PP is the isogonal conjugate of QQ. \Box

The converse of this theorem is also true; given isogonal conjugates PP and QQ inside ABCABC we can construct a suitable ellipse. Moreover, it’s worth noting that the lines ADAD, BEBE, CFCF are also concurrent; one proof is to take a projective transformation which sends the ellipse to a circle.

Using this theorem, we can give a “morally correct” solution to the following problem, which is IMO Shortlist 2000, Problem G3.

Problem. Let OO be the circumcenter and HH the orthocenter of an acute triangle ABCABC. Show that there exist points DD, EE, and FF on sides BCBC, CACA, and ABAB respectively such that

OD+DH=OE+EH=OF+FHOD + DH = OE + EH = OF + FH

and the lines ADAD, BEBE, and CFCF are concurrent.

Proof: Because OO and HH are isogonal conjugates we can construct an ellipse tangent to the sides at DD, EE, FF from which both conditions follow. \Box

5. Pascal’s theorem

For more on isogonal conjugates, see e.g. Darij Grinberg. I’ll just leave off with one more nice application of isogonal conjugates, communicated to me by M Kural last August.

Theorem 4 (Pascal). Let AEBDFCAEBDFC by a cyclic hexagon, as shown. Suppose P=ABDEP = \overline{AB} \cap \overline{DE} Q=CDFAQ = \overline{CD} \cap \overline{FA}, and X=BCEFX = \overline{BC} \cap \overline{EF}. Then points PP, XX, QQ are collinear.

Pascal theorem.
Pascal theorem.

Proof: Notice that XEBXCF\triangle XEB \sim \triangle XCF, though the triangles have opposite orientations. Because BEP=BED=BCD=XCQ\angle BEP = \angle BED = \angle BCD = \angle XCQ, and so on, the points PP and QQ correspond to isogonal conjugates. Hence EXP=QXF\angle EXP = \angle QXF, which gives the collinearity. \Box

Thanks to R Alweiss and heron1618 for pointing out a few typos, and Daniel Paleka for noticing a careless application of Brianchon’s theorem.