vEnhance's avatar

Aug 11, 2015

🖉 The Mixtilinear Incircle

This blog post corresponds to my newest olympiad handout on mixtilinear incircles.

My favorite circle associated to a triangle is the AA-mixtilinear incircle. While it rarely shows up on olympiads, it is one of the richest configurations I have seen, with many unexpected coincidences showing up, and I would be overjoyed if they become fashionable within the coming years.

Here’s the picture:

The A-mixtilinear incircle.
The A-mixtilinear incircle.

The points DD and EE are the contact points of the incircle and AA-excircle on the side BCBC. Points MAM_A, MBM_B, MCM_C are the midpoints of the arcs.

As a challenge to my recent USAMO class (I taught at A* Summer Camp this year), I asked them to find as many “coincidences” in the picture as I could (just to illustrate the richness of the configuration). I invite you to do the same with the picture above.

The results of this exercise were somewhat surprising. Firstly, I found out that students without significant olympiad experience can’t “see” cyclic quadrilaterals in a picture. Through lots of training I’ve gained the ability to notice, with some accuracy, when four points in a diagram are concyclic. This has taken me a long way both in setting problems and solving them. (Aside: I wonder if it might be possible to train this skill by e.g. designing an “eyeballing” game with real olympiad problems. I would totally like to make this happen.)

The other two things that happened: one, I discovered one new property while preparing the handout, and two, a student found yet another property which I hadn’t known to be true before. In any case, I ended up covering the board in plenty of ink.

Me doodling on white board.
Me doodling on white board.

Here’s the list of properties I have.

  1. First, the classic: by Pascal’s Theorem on TMCCABMBTM_CCABM_B, we find that points B1B_1, II, CC are collinear; hence the contact chord of the AA-mixtilinear incircle passes through the incenter. The special case of this problem with AB=ACAB = AC appeared in IMO 1978. - Then, by Pascal on BCMCTMAABCM_CTM_AA, we discover that lines BCBC, B1C1B_1C_1, and TMATM_A are also concurrent. - This also lets us establish (by angle chasing) that BB1ITBB_1IT and CC1ITCC_1IT are concyclic.

    In addition, lines BMBBM_B and CMCCM_C are tangents to these circumcircles at II (again by angle chasing).

  2. An Iran 2002 problem asks to show that ray TITI passes through the point diametrically opposite MAM_A on the circumcircle. This is solved by noticing that TATA is a symmedian of the triangle TB1C1TB_1C_1 and (by the previous fact) that TITI is a median. This is the key lemma in Taiwan TST 2014, Problem 3, which is one of my favorite problems (a nice result by Cosmin Pohoatza).

  3. Lines ATAT and AEAE are isogonal. This was essentially EGMO 2012, Problem 5, and the “morally correct” solution is to do an inversion at AA followed by a reflection along the A\angle A-bisector (sometimes we call this a “bc\sqrt{bc} inversion”). - As a consequence of this, one can also show that lines TATA and TDTD are isogonal (with respect to BTC\angle BTC). - One can also deduce from this that the circumcircle of TDMA\triangle TDM_A passes through the intersection of BCBC and AMAAM_A.
  4. Lines ADAD and TMATM_A meet on the mixtilinear incircle. (Homothety!)
  5. Moreover, line ATAT passes through the exsimilicenter of the incircle and circumcircle, by, say Monge d’Alembert. Said another way, the mentioned exsimilicenter is the isogonal conjugate of the Nagel point.

To put that all into one picture:

The full picture.
The full picture.